Shaken by the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and more
recently, the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant disaster, will the IFR fulfill the
nuclear energy industry’s needs for a safe nuclear fission power plant?
By: Ringo Bones
For over 50 years, the world has been waiting for the dream
of the practical nuclear fusion energy to be realized – but engineers at
Argonne National Laboratory had already tested the supposedly safe next
generation of that old and much-abused standby – the nuclear fission reactor.
Since 1991, nuclear engineers at Argonne had not only tested but had built a
kind of nuclear fission reactor that not only is inherently safe but also
consumes its own dangerous radioactive wastes – including dangerous radioactive
wastes from other older commercial fission nuclear power plants.
The Argonne nuclear engineers’ design is dubbed the Integral
Fast Reactor or IFR that uses high-energy or “fast” neutrons to trigger the
nuclear fission chain reaction. In contrast, conventional light-water reactors
which are currently used by over 99% of the global nuclear fission power plant
industry typically slow their neutrons down with a “moderator” like graphite
rods or heavy water. And given that fast neutrons can cause many more types of
elements to undergo fission, the IFR is not limited to using uranium and
plutonium that conventional commercial nuclear fission reactors use as fuel.
The IFR can also use the highly radioactive elements with
half-lives of tens of thousands or even a few million years that are
by-products of uranium and plutonium fission that are deemed as “radioactive
wastes” as its own fuel. By separating the long-lived radioactive isotopes out
of the waste stream, nuclear power plant operators using the IFR type nuclear
fission reactor will finally eliminate the problem of having a huge inventory
of radioactive wastes that requires hundreds of thousands, and like
neptunium-237, even a few million years of containment. And unlike the more
familiar breeder-type nuclear fission reactors still operating in Europe and
Japan, the IFR can “burn” plutonium rather than producing it. It thus precludes
the possibility that a cache of nuclear weapons-grade fuel might fall into the
hands of rogue states and terrorist bomb makers – lessening the headache of the
International Atomic Energy Commission when it comes to “auditing” potential
nuclear weapons-grade materials used by most typical commercial nuclear fission
power plants.
The other great advantage of the IFR, according to its
designers at Argonne, is a safety system that makes it virtually resistant
against those catastrophic loss-of-coolant accidents that crippled the Three
Mile Island, Chernobyl, and more recently the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant during
the Japanese tsunami of March 11, 2011. The IFR’s fuel assembly is designed in
such a way that it would actually expand if it started to get too hot. This
thermal expansion would allow more neutrons to escape from the reactor core and
since it is the neutrons that trigger fission, the neutron leakage would slow
the chain reaction and eventually bring it to a halt – before a disastrous core
meltdown could occur. And given the lack of progress in the commercial
applications of nuclear fusion, the IFR seems to be the only near-term
technology currently available that can provide a huge energy source while
addressing global warming and environmental concerns over excessive carbon
dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions in commercial power generation.
1 comment:
Integral Fast Reactor - The Pacifist's Nuclear Fission Reactor?
Post a Comment